Home     Contact Us         Log in
Oct 07
Saturday
Pacific Northwest
A Center That Works

A concise description of the outer, inner and secret levels of Shambhala Center design

by Russell Rodgers

Recently, the Kootenay Shambhala Centre in Nelson, British Columbia, purchased a building. Because we had to acquire the services of a non-sangha architect for the renovations, it seemed like a good idea to summarize for them in plain language some of the basic elements of how a Shambhala Centre functions and how it is designed. This summary is offered here as something that may be useful to other centers working with architects and designers who are not necessarily Shambhala practitioners.


In Shambhala design, one has three levels of manifestation. Ideally, these are reflected in the spatial organization of the building. For a more complete description, see Shambhala Environments. To put it briefly, here are some main points:

1. There is an outer level that is reflected in what one can perceive directly with the senses. Anyone can see this: so these parts of the building are the most public, the most obvious, and the most universally accessible. The entry, community room, children’s room and kitchen operate on this level.

Community gathering space at the Kootenay Shambhala Centre

2. There is an inner level that reflects energy and felt atmosphere. This level is felt individually by each person, and it’s meaning has to be personally experienced. What an individual feels is not obvious to others, because it is an inner experience. This level is what is being worked on in the main shrine room. People might feel a sense of spaciousness and presence in the room, but they would mostly be concerned with thoughts and perceptions that occur within that spaciousness. Spatially, it would be near the community room, but need to be somewhat protected from its sound and activity.

3. There is a secret level that reflects ultimate understanding. Like the inner level, it is not obvious to others – but here it is even less obvious. It refers to the most basic level of mind, the spacious emptiness that cannot be described with words, but which has the power and potential to manifest as thoughts, emotions and perceptions. Here we are dealing with the spacious mind itself, beyond the obvious individual occurrences. Access to this level is transmitted by realized persons in the lineage. Subsequent to that transmission, the vajrayana practices bring the practitioner towards fruition. The Sakyong’s room and the vajrayana shrine room would be in parts of the building that are the least accessible, reflecting the fact that it would be a mistake to try to interpret this level with conventional words and thinking. At the same time, it reflects the ultimate importance of the secret mandala.

All the different levels, within and without the building, should reflect a sense of dignity, wakefulness, uplift and spaciousness. However, as one gets closer to the secret level, the décor reflects this more and more and takes on a transmission quality.

For example, one could experience an ikebana arrangement according to outer, inner and secret levels. On the outer level, anyone can see the flowers. On the next level, there is the spaciousness, energy and beauty of the arrangement.  Each person experiences this in private on an inner level. On a secret level, there is the spacious and powerful nature of the mind itself. This level is the ultimate nature of the images and the mind that manifests them.

It’s not that the public is cut off from the inner and secret parts of the building, but there’s a sense that preparation is required both to experience it properly and to understand what one has experienced. If these areas are not somewhat protected, their meaning will get lost in the shuffle.


And here is how those guidelines were implemented in the new Kootenay Shambhala Centre in Nelson, British Columbia:

The Kootenay Centre’s “people magnet” — the island in front of the kitchen

Basically, we followed the directions from Shambhala Environments in the design of the community room. Partly this was also informed by our experience with our old Centre, which had a prominent view of the kitchen when someone entered. This provokes a sense of hospitality. People move through the sitting area towards the kitchen before entering the wide hallway to the shrine room. The bookstore is visible from that hallway.

The important feature that I want to focus on here is the island that is in front of the kitchen (brought over from our old centre). It shows a group of people standing around it–which is so absolutely typical that it deserves to be commented on. At open house and during tea break at nyinthun, people automatically gather there, whether there is food or not. Sometimes I try to lure people to the more comfortable chairs and couches, but it takes effort. The default gathering place is the island, and it provokes spontaneous conversation.
One of our members points out that gathering at the island provides more fluidity than choosing a comfortable chair–you are not committed to talking to the same person for the next half an hour. With the island, you are more likely to move around, get refreshments and more tea and mingle in different places.
Sometimes at potlucks, during discussion groups or meetings, people do sit in the comfortable chairs. In that case there is a subtly awkward pressure to have whole group conversations rather than fluid one-on-ones at the island that morph into groups that people can drop into or out of spontaneously. In terms of bringing groups into common focus, the island itself seems to create a natural centre. We are toying with the idea of replacing the couches with smaller, more moveable upholstered chairs–seating that can be oriented towards the island.

With the Sakyong currently emphasizing “good conversation” and other forms of community building, creating public spaces that magnetize those things—by the design of the spaces, by the way the spaces are furnished, by the people who occupy the spaces, by the ‘feel’ of the spaces, and by other means—seems especially timely and important.


Editor’s note: readers interested in engaging in communication around design issues of this kind are encouraged to post a comment on this article; the Times will gladly help you connect with one another!

Russell Rodgers has been a practicing Shambhalian for more than 39 years. He resides in the Kootenay mountains of British Columbia, in the town of Nelson
Be Sociable, Share!
Post Tags: , ,

Related Posts



6 responses to “ A Center That Works ”
  1. James Northcote
    Oct 7, 2017
    Reply

    Thank you, Russell and Kootenay Shambhala community.

    The Kootenay Shambhala Centre has a growing collection of additional resources that might be useful to Shambhala Centres (and other audiences) on their “Shambhala Nelson Resources” page: https://nelson.shambhala.org/shambhala-nelson-resources/

  2. Ellen M. Berger
    Oct 8, 2017
    Reply

    I understand why you state that the Vajrayana shrinerooms should be “the least accessible”, but please, please, do not interpret that as meaning they should be up stairs, which makes them un-accessible to Vajrayana practitioners who are unable to climb stairs. Thank you.

  3. Jay Lippman
    Oct 9, 2017
    Reply

    At our small center in West Chester PA, we only have 3 rooms, plus a 4th which serves as office, library and storage. The 3 rooms are our community room, a beautiful but plain class room with a small wall shrine, and the main shrine room. I’ve begun to think of the class room as fulfilling the “inner level” you describe, and the shrine room as fulfilling the third, “secret level”. This seems to work too, and an additional benefit is that everyone is able to access and experience all three levels.

  4. Timaree Bierle-Dodds
    Oct 9, 2017
    Reply

    Congratulations! Thank you for sharing and all best luck to the community in “allowing a multitude of warriors to train”.

  5. Anne Saitzyk
    Oct 9, 2017
    Reply

    The kitchen island at our Westside L.A. center is also a people magnet. I like your explanation as to why it seems to be so and agree. Our community room is most utilized when we’re crowded and it’s a good place to sit for a book group/discussion.

    Congratulations on your new center!

  6. I think this is great Russell – thank you for observing, speaking it and sharing it.
    Insightful and it makes good sense…..kinda like the Shambhala Dharma!
    A
    ll good wishes from Windhorse Farm-margaret


Post a Comment



Website Development by Blue Mandala using Wordpress MU.
All content and source Copyright © 1994-2017. Shambhala International (Vajradhatu), Shambhala, Shambhala Meditation Center, Shambhala Training, Shambhala Center and Way of Shambhala are registered service marks of Shambhala USA

Facebook

Get the Facebook Likebox Slider Pro for WordPress